12.2 Mediating Sonic Worlds: Critical Approaches to Boundary Objects in Sound-Driven Design

Corresponding Chairs

Stefano Delle Monache

Nicolas Misdariis

Elif Özcan

Co-Chairs

Daniel Hug

Sara Lenzi

Sandra Pauletto

Davide Rocchesso

Simone Spagnol

Abstract

This theme critically examines boundary objects – work arrangements, artefacts and representations facilitating cooperation across diverse social groups – at the intersection of sound and design. 

• Our fundamental question is: how effectively can objects informed or defined by sound and listening fulfil this important role in design?

• Sound-driven design addresses complex socio-technological challenges induced by sound to design for sonic habitability: positive auditory experiences that enhance well-being, foster social connection, and promote a more harmonious relationship between humans, their technologies, and their environments.

• Sonic boundary objects leverage sound and listening to structure information and bridge perspectives among different communities of practices. By telling stories, enhancing performance or creating a setting, annotated sounding prototypes, experiential sound maps, audio segments or sonic sketches, semantic portraits, etc.  contribute to transmit, preserve and receive oral know-how. They act as mediators between ill-structured ideas and specific solutions, empowering diverse groups of listeners to align understanding, cooperate and mobilise action. 

• However, a critical lens is essential. How do the ephemeral and subjective qualities of sound challenge the stability required for a boundary object to have common identity? How do boundary objects shape listening instead? What methodologies effectively capture and represent sonic experiences for shared understanding without oversimplification? How do power dynamics and work arrangements influence the creation, interpretation, and use of sonic boundary objects? 

We encourage papers exploring practical implementations, limitations, and theoretical advancements of sonic boundary objects, contributing to a more nuanced understanding of their role in design research.

Keywords

sound-driven design, boundary objects, design methodology, sonic habitability, co-design

References

Leigh Star, S. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, technology, & human values, 35(5), 601-617.

Tharchen, T., Garud, R., & Henn, R. L. (2020). Design as an interactive boundary object. Journal of Organization Design, 9, 1-34.

Delle Monache, S., Misdariis, N., & Özcan, E. (2022). Semantic models of sound-driven design: Designing with listening in mind. Design Studies, 83, 101134.

Grond, F., & Devos, P. (2016). Sonic boundary objects: negotiating disability, technology and simulation. Digital Creativity, 27(4), 334-346.

Özcan, E., Broekmeulen, C. L., Luck, Z. A., van Velzen, M., Stappers, P. J., & Edworthy, J. R. (2022). Acoustic biotopes, listeners and sound-induced action: a case study of operating rooms. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 16674.